![]() ![]() Its familiarity, drag and drop interface make Apple Mail easy to pick up and put down. When Apple Mail is only used occasionally (several time per week), its faults don’t grate and its qualities shine. My deep recommendation is for a lighter front end IMAP client in front of Apple Mail as the archival system. While both are good programs, with EagleFiler getting the nod for simplicity, versatility and fair pricing (built by same developer as SpamSieve, Michael Tsai), neither offer the same kind of immediate access to archives to be able to reply to an old email like Apple Mail. None of the competition scale like this.įor this reason, Apple Mail remains my archive email client, having tried archiving in MailSteward Pro and EagleFiler. Literally Apple Mail can handle hundreds of thousands or millions of emails, including search, without breaking much of a sweat. ![]() Good point about the size of database which Apple Mail can handle. It never crashes, it never corrupts mailboxes. Nothing out there comes close to it in managing mail, keeping track of millions of emails, and just being solid. That said, I’ve tried many many clients over many many years, and Mail.app is what I use. You could just use an email application which doesn’t require storing your credentials with them. What’s particularly pernicious here is that there’s no need to store one’s email credential on anyone else’s server. I would not store my primary email credentials with a Ukrainian or a Nigerian company (to give two examples), unless I had done deep research on that company and it had a long track record of good security and ethical behaviour. ProtonMail would be an example of a company in the email space with such a secure track record. Even then I would look closely at who the founders are, their level of technical expertise and experience and their past track record. Countries like Switzerland or Canada have such a history. There are other jurisdictions where people and organizations historically have been untrustworthy.Īnd then there are organizations and countries with a long history of rule of law, prudence and privacy. Why don’t they make sense? An American company cannot be trusted (by law, they are unable to protect their customers’ privacy as they are compelled to do what secret courts tell them to do without disclosing the requests to the client or the public). People should go in to Spark with their eyes very wide open.Īlec, in a post-Snowden world your comments do not make sense. So I wouldn’t have an issue with Spark if Readdle didn’t force you to hand over your email credentials, i.e. ![]() I haven’t looked into the fouders of Readdle but I have seen dealt with their now-you-see-it, now-you-don’t weird pricing model on PDF Expert which is now subscription only on iOS. Readdle fails on location (Ukraine ranks right up at the top in terms of corruption and per-capita hacking/criminal activity).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |